Style cleanup.
Add some note about the main reason why st is still that big.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d2ec39f0ef
commit
1584956a60
1 changed files with 14 additions and 5 deletions
17
st.c
17
st.c
|
@ -3091,6 +3091,7 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
|
|||
if(base.fg == defaultfg)
|
||||
base.fg = defaultunderline;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if(IS_TRUECOL(base.fg)) {
|
||||
colfg.alpha = 0xffff;
|
||||
colfg.red = TRUERED(base.fg);
|
||||
|
@ -3113,8 +3114,6 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
|
|||
bg = &dc.col[base.bg];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if(base.mode & ATTR_BOLD) {
|
||||
if(BETWEEN(base.fg, 0, 7)) {
|
||||
/* basic system colors */
|
||||
|
@ -3144,7 +3143,8 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
|
|||
colfg.green = ~fg->color.green;
|
||||
colfg.blue = ~fg->color.blue;
|
||||
colfg.alpha = fg->color.alpha;
|
||||
XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colfg, &revfg);
|
||||
XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colfg,
|
||||
&revfg);
|
||||
fg = &revfg;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3155,7 +3155,8 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
|
|||
colbg.green = ~bg->color.green;
|
||||
colbg.blue = ~bg->color.blue;
|
||||
colbg.alpha = bg->color.alpha;
|
||||
XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colbg, &revbg);
|
||||
XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colbg,
|
||||
&revbg);
|
||||
bg = &revbg;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3258,6 +3259,8 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
|
|||
* Nothing was found in the cache. Now use
|
||||
* some dozen of Fontconfig calls to get the
|
||||
* font for one single character.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Xft and fontconfig are design failures.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
fcpattern = FcPatternDuplicate(font->pattern);
|
||||
fccharset = FcCharSetCreate();
|
||||
|
@ -3301,6 +3304,12 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) {
|
|||
xp += xw.cw * wcwidth(u8char);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is how the loop above actually should be. Why does the
|
||||
* application have to care about font details?
|
||||
*
|
||||
* I have to repeat: Xft and Fontconfig are design failures.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/*
|
||||
XftDrawStringUtf8(xw.draw, fg, font->set, winx,
|
||||
winy + font->ascent, (FcChar8 *)s, bytelen);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue